United States v. Gonzalez-Vela ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    April 11, 2006
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 05-40622
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    LEOBARDO GONZALEZ-VELA,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 7:04-CR-1119
    --------------------
    Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Leobardo Gonzalez-Vela appeals his guilty-plea conviction
    for unlawful reentry in violation of 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
    (b).         In his
    sole issue on appeal, Gonzalez-Vela argues that § 1326(b)’s
    treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as
    sentencing factors rather than as elements of the offense that
    must be found by a jury is unconstitutional in light of Apprendi
    v. New Jersey, 
    530 U.S. 466
     (2000).    Because the Government has
    not invoked the waiver provisions in the plea agreement, the
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 05-40622
    -2-
    waiver does not bind Gonzalez-Vela.     See United States v. Story,
    
    439 F.3d 226
    , 230-31 (5th Cir. 2006).
    Gonzalez-Vela’s constitutional challenge to § 1326(b) is
    foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
    523 U.S. 224
    ,
    235 (1998).   Although Gonzalez-Vela contends that Almendarez-
    Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme
    Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we
    have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that
    Almendarez-Torres remains binding.    See United States v. Garza-
    Lopez, 
    410 F.3d 268
    , 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    126 S. Ct. 298
    (2005).   Gonzalez-Vela properly concedes that his argument is
    foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent,
    but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-40622

Filed Date: 4/11/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014