United States v. Deblasio ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                             No. 99-20275
    -1-
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 99-20275
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    SAMUEL LLOYD DEBLASIO,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. H-95-CR-79-1
    --------------------
    March 27, 2000
    Before JOLLY, JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Samuel Lloyd Deblasio, federal inmate #68209-079, appeals
    the district court’s denial of his motions for a new trial and
    for a default judgment.   Deblasio’s motions for disclosure of
    grand jury transcript and/or dismissal of indictment, release
    pending appeal, disclosure of information regarding disbursement
    of funds, and leave to inspect contents of sealed envelope are
    DENIED.   Deblasio’s motions to supplement motion for disclosure
    of grand jury transcript and for leave to file a brief in excess
    of the page limit in support of motion for disclosure of grand
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 99-20275
    -2-
    jury transcript are GRANTED.
    Deblasio’s motion for a new trial is not based on newly
    discovered evidence.    See United States v. Medina, 
    118 F.3d 371
    ,
    373 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Ugalde, 
    861 F.2d 802
    , 808
    (5th Cir. 1988).   The motion was untimely.   See Fed. R. Crim.
    P. 33.   The district court did not abuse its discretion by
    denying the motion.    See 
    Medina, 118 F.3d at 372
    .
    Deblasio has abandoned any challenge to the denial of the
    motion for a default judgment.    See United States v. Still, 
    102 F.3d 118
    , 122 n.7 (5th Cir. 1996)(issues not argued in the brief
    on appeal are abandoned).
    AFFIRMED; MOTIONS FOR DISCLOSURE OF GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPT,
    RELEASE PENDING APPEAL, DISCLOSURE OF DISBURSEMENT INFORMATION,
    AND LEAVE TO INSPECT CONTENTS OF ENVELOPE DENIED; MOTIONS TO
    SUPPLEMENT AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT
    GRANTED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-20275

Filed Date: 3/27/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014