United States v. Huerta ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   October 17, 2006
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 05-11052
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JAVIER HUERTA, also known as Big Boy,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:03-CR-369-4
    --------------------
    Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Javier Huerta appeals his guilty-plea conviction for
    conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute
    100 kilograms or more of marijuana.    He argues that the written
    judgment of conviction does not accurately reflect the offense to
    which he pleaded guilty.
    As the Government has explicitly declined to invoke the
    appeal waiver regarding the issue raised by Huerta, the appeal
    waiver is not binding on this appeal.     See United States v.
    Story, 
    439 F.3d 226
    , 231 (5th Cir. 2006).
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 05-11052
    -2-
    As the Government concedes, the written judgment describes
    the nature of Huerta’s offense as conspiracy to distribute and
    possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of
    cocaine and 100 kilograms or more of marijuana while the record
    shows that Huerta pleaded guilty only to conspiracy to distribute
    and possess with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of
    marijuana.   This error is a clerical error subject to correction
    pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.   See United States v. Sapp, 
    439 F.2d 817
    , 821 (5th Cir. 1971).     Accordingly, we affirm Huerta’s
    conviction and sentence and remand this case to the district
    court for correction of the clerical error in the judgment
    pursuant to Rule 36.
    AFFIRMED; MOTION TO GRANT RELIEF REQUESTED GRANTED; REMANDED
    FOR CORRECTION OF CLERICAL ERROR IN JUDGMENT.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-11052

Judges: Jolly, Dennis, Clement

Filed Date: 10/17/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024