United States v. Allan Carcamo-Ramirez , 411 F. App'x 763 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 10-40205 Document: 00511382031 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    February 15, 2011
    No. 10-40205
    Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    ALLAN EDGARDO CARCAMO-RAMIREZ,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 7:09-CR-1420-1
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Allan Edgardo Carcamo-Ramirez (Carcamo) appeals the sentence imposed
    following his conviction for being found in the United States after a previous
    deportation pursuant to 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
    . Carcamo contends that the district
    court erred by imposing a 16-level crime of violence enhancement based on his
    prior Texas conviction for indecency by contact with a child under 17 years of
    age, a violation of Texas Penal Code § 21.11(a)(2). He argues that the Texas
    conviction is not within the enumerated offense of sexual abuse of a minor
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
    R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 10-40205 Document: 00511382031 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
    No. 10-40205
    because an offense under § 21.11(a) can be committed against a victim who is 16
    years of age.   The Government moves for summary affirmance or, in the
    alternative, for an extension of time to file a brief.
    As Carcamo concedes, his argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent. See
    United States v. Ayala, 
    542 F.3d 494
    , 495 (5th Cir. 2008); United States v.
    Zavala-Sustaita, 
    214 F.3d 601
    , 604 (5th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the judgment
    of the district court is AFFIRMED, and the Government’s motion for summary
    affirmance is GRANTED. The alternative request for an extension of time to file
    a brief is DENIED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-40205

Citation Numbers: 411 F. App'x 763

Judges: Higginbotham, Garza, Elrod

Filed Date: 2/15/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024