Boyd v. City of Houston ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    _______________________
    No. 95-20345
    Summary Calendar
    _______________________
    CAROLYN W. BOYD, Pro Se,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS and CITY
    OF HOUSTON PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    (CA-H-94-2)
    _________________________________________________________________
    February 14, 1996
    Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    The     judgment    of   the   district   court    is   affirmed   for
    essentially the reasons stated in its orders entered June 3, 1994 and
    April 25, 1995.     In addition, we note Boyd’s failure to comply with
    this court’s briefing Rule 28.2.3, requiring page references to the
    district court record.       Boyd’s inattention to this briefing rule alone
    would have justified rejection of her appeal.        Moore v. FDIC, 
    993 F.2d 106
    (5th Cir. 1993).     Further, Boyd’s brief is devoid of a coherent
    legal argument for overturning the summary judgment.
    *
    Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the
    limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
    AFFIRMED.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-20345

Filed Date: 2/26/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021