Steven Walcott, Jr. v. Nurse Pat ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 17-30789       Document: 00514690468         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/19/2018
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 17-30789                           October 19, 2018
    Summary Calendar                           Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    STEVEN ANTHONY WALCOTT, JR.,
    Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    PAT NAQUIN; TERREBONNE PARISH JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT;
    RICHARD NEAL, Head Nurse/Doctor; TERREBONNE PARISH
    CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT,
    Defendants - Appellees
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 2:16-CV-15587
    Before BARKSDALE, ELROD, and HO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, Steven Anthony Walcott, Jr.,
    Terrebonne Parish # 51734 and Louisiana prisoner # 344820, contests the
    dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failure to state
    a claim on which relief can be granted.                He contends defendants were
    * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.
    R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-30789     Document: 00514690468      Page: 2    Date Filed: 10/19/2018
    No. 17-30789
    deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs by denying him effective
    and immediate dental care.
    We must, however, determine sua sponte whether we have jurisdiction
    to review this appeal. Mosley v. Cozby, 
    813 F.2d 659
    , 660 (5th Cir. 1987). A
    timely appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite if, as here, the time limit is set by
    statute. Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 
    138 S. Ct. 13
    , 16 (2017);
    Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a).
    In a civil matter, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry
    of the judgment or order being appealed. 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P.
    4(a)(1)(A). The final judgment dismissing Walcott’s complaint was entered on
    22 August 2017. Walcott averred he placed his notice of appeal in the prison
    mailing system on 25 September 2017. See Stoot v. Cain, 
    570 F.3d 669
    , 671
    (5th Cir. 2009) (prison mailbox rule). Therefore, Walcott’s notice of appeal is
    untimely.
    Although his appeal was filed within the 30-day period to seek an
    extension of time based on excusable neglect or good cause, Fed. R. App.
    P. 4(a)(5)(A), his notice of appeal is not such a request because he did not
    provide any explanation for his late filing, see Durham v. Anderson, 699 F.
    App’x 389, 389 (5th Cir. 2017); Nichols v. Hickman, 699 F. App’x 330, 330–31
    (5th Cir. 2017). Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See
    
    Hamer, 138 S. Ct. at 16
    ; 
    Bowles, 551 U.S. at 215
    .
    DISMISSED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-30789

Filed Date: 10/19/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021