United States v. Guzman-Gutierrez ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-40344
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JOSUE GUZMAN-GUTIERREZ,
    also known as Josque Guzman-Gutierrez,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. L-01-CR-825-ALL
    --------------------
    September 24, 2002
    Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Josue Guzman-Gutierrez appeals his sentence with respect to
    the imposition of a three-year term of supervised release
    following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the
    United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
    He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his
    increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of
    the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-40344
    -2-
    Guzman-Gutierrez acknowledges that his argument was rejected
    by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United
    States, 
    523 U.S. 224
    (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue
    for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v.
    New Jersey, 
    530 U.S. 466
    , 490 (2000).     This argument is
    foreclosed because Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.
    See 
    Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90
    , 496; United States v. Dabeit,
    
    231 F.3d 979
    , 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 
    121 S. Ct. 1214
    (2001).
    Guzman-Gutierrez also argues that the district court
    committed error during the plea colloquy by advising him that he
    was subject to a maximum of one year of supervised release.
    Guzman-Gutierrez does not seek to withdraw his plea, but he wants
    his sentence reformed to reflect one year of supervised release.
    The Government concedes the error and also urges the court to
    reform the judgment of conviction.   See United States v. Glinsey,
    
    209 F.3d 386
    , 394-96 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 
    531 U.S. 919
    , 394
    (2000).
    Guzman-Gutierrez’s term of supervised release is MODIFIED to
    one year.   The conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-40344

Filed Date: 9/27/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014