Munoz v. Jambon ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    __________________
    No. 95-31143
    Summary Calendar
    __________________
    JUVENTINO MUNOZ,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    KEITH SIMONE ET AL.,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    USDC No. CA-95-2559-L
    - - - - - - - - - -
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    ___________________
    No. 95-31304
    Summary Calendar
    __________________
    JUVENTINO MUNOZ,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    GLEN JAMBON, Major,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 94-CV-4192-J
    - - - - - - - - - -
    May 16, 1996
    Nos. 95-31143 & 95-31304
    -2-
    Before GARWOOD, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Juventino Munoz appeals the dismissal of two civil rights
    complaints.    In the first, Munoz argues that the district court
    erred by dismissing his use-of-force and denial-of-medical-care
    claims as time-barred.     See Munoz v. Simone, No. CA-95-2559-L
    (E.D. La.; Oct. 30, 1995).    We have reviewed the record and
    Munoz's brief and AFFIRM the district court's dismissal of the
    claims for the same reasons set forth by the district court.       Id.
    In the second, Munoz argues in general terms that the
    district court abused its discretion by dismissing as frivolous
    his complaint wherein he alleged that his legal mail was opened
    outside of his presence.    As the district court's dismissal was
    for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted,
    Munoz's arguments on appeal are unavailing and we AFFIRM the
    dismissal for the same reasons set forth by the district court.
    See Munoz v. Jambon, No. 94-CV-4192-J (E.D. La.; Feb. 10, 1995).
    No. 95-31143 AFFIRMED.
    No. 95-31304 AFFIRMED.
    *
    Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
    47.5.4.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-31304

Filed Date: 5/31/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021