Larry Jones v. State of Georgia , 475 F.2d 1141 ( 1973 )


Menu:
  • 475 F.2d 1141

    Larry JONES, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF GEORGIA et al., Respondents-Appellees.

    No. 72-3659 Summary Calendar.*

    United States Court of Appeals,
    Fifth Circuit.

    April 27, 1973.

    James C. Bonner, Decatur, Ga., (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.

    Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Courtney Wilder Stanton, David L. G. King, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondents-appellees.

    Before BELL, GODBOLD and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

    PER CURIAM:

    1

    Court-appointed counsel for appellant, a Georgia state prisoner habeas applicant, has asserted one principal error on this appeal. In addition, deeming it to be his duty in a habeas case, he has conscientiously catalogued other possible errors for the consideration of the court.

    2

    The principal assignment of error, that the state trial court erred in the charge to the jury on voluntary manslaughter (called a due process violation), is, in the context of the total charge, without merit. The additional assignments of error are also without merit.1

    3

    Affirmed.

    *

    Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409

    1

    The additional assignments of error are the following:

    1

    Appellant's conviction for voluntary manslaughter on an indictment charging murder was a violation of due process

    2

    Appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel at trial

    3

    Appellant was arrested in violation of the Fourth Amendment

    4

    Appellant's conviction was obtained by the use of an involuntary confession

    5

    Appellant was denied assistance of counsel at the commitment hearing

    6

    Appellant was denied the right to present witnesses in his behalf because his trial counsel did not call certain witnesses who attended trial under subpoena

    7

    Appellant's conviction was obtained by the use of improperly suggestive identification procedures

Document Info

Docket Number: 72-3659

Citation Numbers: 475 F.2d 1141, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10246

Judges: Bell, Godbold, In-Graham, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 4/27/1973

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024