United States v. Cropp , 84 F. App'x 441 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS         January 5, 2004
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 03-10142
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    SHAWN DOUGLAS CROPP,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:02-CR-6-1-Y
    --------------------
    Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Shawn Douglas Cropp was charged in a two-count indictment
    for being a felon in possession of firearms.   See 18 U.S.C.
    § 922(g)(1).   He was tried before a jury and convicted.      Cropp
    has appealed, contending that the evidence did not prove that he
    knowingly possessed a firearm.
    Cropp was arrested after guns were found during the traffic
    stop of a vehicle in which Cropp was a passenger.   A reasonable
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 03-10142
    -2-
    juror could have concluded from Cropp’s proximity to the weapons
    which were in plain view, the number of weapons found in the
    vehicle, Cropp’s furtive movements, and the concealment of a
    pistol in the crack of the seat underneath Cropp, that Cropp had
    dominion or control over the weapons.       See United States v.
    Ybarra, 
    70 F.3d 362
    , 365 (5th Cir. 1995); see also United States
    v. Smith, 
    930 F.2d 1081
    , 1085–86 (5th Cir. 1991).      The judgment
    of conviction is affirmed.
    Although Cropp has not raised the issue and has not filed a
    reply brief, the Government states correctly that the district
    court plainly-erred in imposing consecutive terms of supervised
    release.   See United States v. Myers, 
    104 F.3d 76
    , 81 (5th Cir.
    1997); 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e); U.S.S.G. § 5G1.2, comment. (n.2).      We
    vacate the sentence and remand the case to the district court for
    resentencing.
    AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-10142

Citation Numbers: 84 F. App'x 441

Judges: Jones, Benavides, Clement

Filed Date: 1/5/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024