Stone v. Cain ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                  IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 01-30267
    Conference Calendar
    KENNETH STONE,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    versus
    BURL CAIN,
    Respondent-Appellee.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 00-CV-1649-K
    --------------------
    February 20, 2003
    Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Kenneth Stone, Louisiana prisoner # 85667, appeals the
    dismissal of his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     application.    Stone filed the
    application to challenge his conviction on heroin possession and
    distribution charges.    The district court granted a certificate
    of appealability (COA) as to whether Campbell v. Louisiana,
    
    523 U.S. 392
     (1998), applied retroactively to Stone’s claims.
    Stone argues that Campbell announced a new rule of law for
    purposes of 
    28 U.S.C. § 2244
    (d)(1)(C) and submits that the rule
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 01-30267
    -2-
    of Campbell applies retroactively.    He contends that his
    application was timely under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2244
    (d)(1)(C) as it was
    filed within one year of the date that the right was recognized
    by the United States Supreme Court in Campbell.
    In Campbell the Supreme Court held, on direct review from a
    criminal conviction, that a white defendant possessed standing to
    object to discrimination against black people in the selection of
    his grand jury.    See Campbell, 
    523 U.S. at 400
    .   After the grant
    of COA, we held that Campbell does not apply retroactively to
    cases on collateral review.    See Peterson v. Cain, 
    302 F.3d 508
    ,
    512-15 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 
    123 S. Ct. 886
     (2003).
    The holding of Peterson disposes of the issue on which COA was
    granted.    Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-30267

Filed Date: 2/21/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014