Cobb v. Morrison , 71 F. App'x 402 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                          United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 August 20, 2003
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 03-40349
    Conference Calendar
    KEITH O. COBB,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    versus
    MARVIN MORRISON, Warden,
    Respondent-Appellee.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:02-CV-835
    --------------------
    Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Keith O. Cobb, a federal prisoner (# 60806-080), appeals the
    district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas
    corpus, filed pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
    .     In 1995, the
    district court for the Western District of Texas imposed upon
    Cobb concurrent prison terms of 400 months and 60 months for his
    jury-trial convictions of conspiracy to possess cocaine with
    intent to distribute and conspiracy to launder money.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 03-40349
    -2-
    The district court did not err in dismissing the petition.
    Cobb’s claim that his sentence is unconstitutional under Apprendi
    v. New Jersey, 
    530 U.S. 466
     (2000), does not satisfy the test for
    filing a 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     petition under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
    ’s
    “savings clause.”   See Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary, Beaumont, TX,
    
    305 F.3d 343
    , 347-48 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 
    123 S. Ct. 1374
     (2003); Reyes-Requena v. United States, 
    243 F.3d 893
    , 904
    (5th Cir. 2001).
    Cobb’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus
    frivolous.   See Howard v. King, 
    707 F.2d 215
    , 219-20 (5th Cir.
    1983).   Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED.    See
    5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    APPEAL DISMISSED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-40349

Citation Numbers: 71 F. App'x 402

Judges: Jones, Wiener, Benavides

Filed Date: 8/19/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024