Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. School Board Vermilion Parish , 78 F. App'x 431 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 October 22, 2003
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 02-30857
    Conference Calendar
    SHIRLEY JOHNSON,
    on behalf of Kioki Johnson,
    Individually and Tutor,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    SCHOOL BOARD VERMILION PARISH; ET AL.,
    Defendants,
    SCHOOL BOARD VERMILION PARISH,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 99-CV-1889
    --------------------
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, Shirley Johnson,
    acting on behalf of her minor daughter, Kioki, appeals the
    magistrate judge’s dismissal of her harassment suit brought under
    Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 
    20 U.S.C. § 1681
    .
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-30857
    -2-
    Johnson contends, in a single paragraph in the argument section
    of her appellate brief, that the magistrate judge erred in
    determining that the defendant’s response to the sexual
    harassment allegations fell short of the deliberate indifference
    required for recovery.   Johnson’s brief is inadequate to preserve
    this issue for appeal since she neither refers to the record nor
    cites legal authority.   FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9).   Accordingly,
    she has waived this claim.    See Yohey v. Collins, 
    985 F.2d 222
    ,
    224-25 (5th Cir. 1993)(issues must be properly briefed to be
    preserved for appeal).   In any event, the evidence adduced at
    trial supports the magistrate judge’s findings.      See Davis v.
    Monroe County Bd. of Educ., 
    526 U.S. 629
    , 643, 650 (1999).
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-30857

Citation Numbers: 78 F. App'x 431

Judges: King, Jolly, Stewart

Filed Date: 10/21/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024