Castro-Jiminez v. Bulger , 104 F. App'x 440 ( 2004 )

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 17, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-60271
Conference Calendar
RENE CASTRO-JIMINEZ,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
JOHN M. BULGER, Acting Director Immigration and
Naturalization Service,
Respondent-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 5:03-CV-464-BRSU
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rene Castro-Jiminez, federal prisoner # 90503-000, appeals
the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his
continued immigration detention. Castro, an inadmissible Mariel
Cuban, argues pursuant to Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001),
that his continued detention is violative of his constitutional
rights.
Castro’s claim is foreclosed by Gisbert v. U.S. Atty. Gen.,
988 F.2d 1437, 1442 (5th Cir.), amended by, Gisbert v. U.S. Atty.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-60271
-2-
Gen., 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir. 1993). See Rios v. INS, 324 F.3d
296, 297 (5th Cir. 2003). Therefore, the district court did not
err in denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition.
Castro’s request that his appeal be stayed pending the
Supreme Court’s decision in Benitez v. Wallis, 337 F.3d 1289(11th Cir. 2003), cert. granted, 124 S. Ct. 1143 (U.S. Jan. 16,
2004) (No. 03-7434), is denied. Despite the grant of certiorari,
we continue to follow our own binding precedent. See Wicker v.
McCotter, 798 F.2d 155, 157-58 (5th Cir. 1986). Castro’s request
for appointment of counsel is similarly denied.
AFFIRMED; MOTIONS FOR STAY OF APPEAL AND APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL DENIED.