Hussain v. Ashcroft , 106 F. App'x 923 ( 2004 )

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-60008
Summary Calendar
ASHFAQ HUSSAIN, also known as Ali Asfaq, Haziq Zaman,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A78 425 754
--------------------
Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ashfaq Hussain, a native and citizen of Pakistan, has filed
a petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (BIA) denying his application for asylum and withholding
of removal. Hussain argues that he clearly established that he
suffered past persecution because on two separate occasions he
was arrested, detained for several months, and beaten by
Pakistani police due to his membership in the Muttahida Quami
Movement (MQM) political party. He argues that he has
established that he has a well-founded fear of future persecution
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-60008
-2-
due to his political activities if he returned to Pakistan. The
Immigration Judge (IJ) found that Hussain was not a credible
witness and that his testimony was internally contradictory and
unbelievable; the IJ denied his request for asylum. The BIA
affirmed the IJ’s decision. We will not substitute our judgment
of Hussain’s credibility for that of the IJ and BIA. See Efe v.
Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 905 (5th Cir. 2002). Hussain has not
shown that the evidence in the record compels a conclusion
contrary to the decision of the IJ and BIA that he was not a
credible witness and that he did not establish his eligibility
for asylum. See Lopez De Jesus v. INS, 312 F.3d 155, 161 (5th
Cir. 2002).
PETITION DENIED.