Scales v. Dretke ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                                         United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   October 19, 2004
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 04-10011
    Summary Calendar
    NOLAN WAYNE SCALES,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    versus
    DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR,
    TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
    CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,
    Respondent-Appellee.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:03-CV-1237-R
    --------------------
    Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Petitioner-Appellant,   Nolan   Wayne   Scales,   Texas   prisoner
    # 798414, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     petition challenging his murder conviction as barred by the
    one-year statute of limitations in 
    28 U.S.C. § 2244
    (d).               The
    district court granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on the
    issue whether the filing of Scales’s federal habeas petition is
    subject to equitable tolling.   Scales’s conviction became final on
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    July 31, 2000, the last date for seeking direct review from the
    Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.    See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2244
    (d)(1)(A);
    Salinas v. Dretke, 
    354 F.3d 425
    , 430 (5th Cir), cert. denied, 
    124 S. Ct. 2099
     (2004).   Scales had one year, or until July 31, 2001,
    in which to file a federal habeas petition. The limitations period
    was tolled from February 21, 2001, the date on which he filed his
    state habeas application, until May 9, 2001, the date on which it
    was denied.   At that time, Scales had 160 days remaining, or until
    October 16, 2001, to file a timely federal habeas petition.      His
    second state habeas application did not toll the limitations period
    because it was filed on November 7, 2001, after the expiration of
    the limitations period.   See Scott v. Johnson, 
    227 F.3d 260
    , 263
    (5th Cir. 2000).
    Scales argues that the limitations period should have been
    equitably tolled from May 5, 2003, the date on which his second
    state habeas application was denied, until May 27, 2003, the date
    on which he received notice of the decision.       The limitations
    period expired on October 16, 2001, however, before Scales filed
    his second state habeas application on November 7, 2001, so the
    limitations period was not tolled during the pendency of Scales’s
    second state habeas application.   See Scott, 
    227 F.3d at 263
    .
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-10011

Judges: Wiener, Benavides, Stewart

Filed Date: 10/19/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024