United States v. Gregory Howard , 429 F. App'x 430 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 10-30972     Document: 00511514590          Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/21/2011
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    June 21, 2011
    No. 10-30972
    Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    GREGORY CHARLES HOWARD,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 3:03-CR-174-1
    Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Gregory Charles Howard, federal prisoner # 04073-095, appeals the
    district court’s grant of his 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence
    based on the amendments to the crack cocaine Guideline. Howard, through the
    Federal Public Defender, contends that the district court abused its discretion
    by not granting a reduction to the middle of the recalculated guidelines range.
    He also contends that the district court committed procedural error or abused
    its discretion by failing to give reasons for the sentence.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
    R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 10-30972   Document: 00511514590      Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/21/2011
    No. 10-30972
    As Howard concedes, his arguments are foreclosed by United States v.
    Evans, 
    587 F.3d 667
     (5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 
    130 S. Ct. 3462
     (2010). In
    Evans, we noted that, because the district court was under no obligation to
    reduce the defendant’s sentence at all, it was under no obligation to reduce the
    sentence even further within the recalculated range. 
    Id. at 673
    . In addition, the
    district court was not required to give reasons for granting the defendant’s
    § 3582(c)(2) motion but not imposing a lower sentence within the recalculated
    guidelines range. Id. at 674. Accordingly, Howard’s contentions are foreclosed
    by Evans, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See id. at
    672-74.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-30972

Citation Numbers: 429 F. App'x 430

Judges: Jones, Stewart, Southwick

Filed Date: 6/21/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024