Isaac v. Hiatt ( 1949 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    A careful consideration of the judgment in this case in the light of the record leaves us in no doubt that the appeal is without merit. Zerbst v. McPike, 5 Cir., 97 F.2d 253; Rohr v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 105 F.2d *147747; Lunsford v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 126 F.2d 653. The judgment is affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 12774

Judges: Holmes, Hutcheson, Sibley

Filed Date: 10/25/1949

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/4/2024