United States v. Gamez-Silva , 289 F. App'x 827 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    August 20, 2008
    No. 08-40042
    Conference Calendar             Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    ROLANDO GAMEZ-SILVA
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:07-CR-940-ALL
    Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Rolando Gamez-Silva appeals from his sentence for being an alien
    unlawfully found in the United States after deportation following a felony
    conviction. He asserts that the district court erred by imposing a 16-level
    enhancement based upon his prior Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation.
    Although he recognizes our precedent that this offense is a crime of violence for
    U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 purposes, he argues that James v. United States, 127 S. Ct.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
    should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 08-40042
    1586, 1599-1600 (2007), overrules it. His argument is unpersuasive. In United
    States v. Gomez-Guerra, 
    485 F.3d 301
    , 303 n.1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    128 S. Ct. 156
    (2007), we noted that James pertains only to a residual provision of 18
    U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i) that is absent from § 2L1.2. Consequently, James is not
    dispositive. Because we have held that the Texas offense of burglary of a
    habitation constitutes a crime of violence for purposes of § 2L1.2, the district
    court did not err in applying the enhancement. See 
    Gomez-Guerra, 485 F.3d at 304
    & n.3; United States v. Garcia-Mendez, 
    420 F.3d 454
    , 456-57 (5th Cir. 2005).
    The Government’s motions for summary affirmance and to waive the
    requirement to file an appellee’s brief are GRANTED, the Government’s motion
    for an extension of time to file an appellee’s brief is DENIED, and the judgment
    of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-40042

Citation Numbers: 289 F. App'x 827

Judges: Garza, Clement, Southwick

Filed Date: 8/20/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024