United States v. Michael Davis, Jr. , 620 F. App'x 351 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 14-30130      Document: 00513246375         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/26/2015
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-30130
    Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    October 26, 2015
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    MICHAEL WAYNE DAVIS, JR.,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 3:13-CR-26-1
    ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
    Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    In his direct appeal to this Court last year, the defendant argued that
    the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act was unconstitutionally
    vague and thus void. The defendant acknowledged that this argument was
    forcelosed by existing circuit precedent. See United States v. Gore, 636 F.3d
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-30130    Document: 00513246375    Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/26/2015
    No. 14-30130
    728, 742 (5th Cir. 2011). We thus rejected his argument and affirmed the
    judgment.
    The defendant then filed a petition for certiorari, which the Supreme
    Court granted after its decision in Johnson v. United States, 
    135 S. Ct. 2551
    (June 26, 2015).     The Supreme Court vacated our previous ruling and
    remanded for consideration in light of Johnson, which concluded that the
    residual clause is vague and thus void.
    The Armed Career Criminal Act was applied to the defendant based on
    a finding that a prior conviction qualified under the residual clause. That
    resulted in application of a fifteen-year mandatory minimum sentence. Absent
    application of the Armed Career Criminal Act, the defendant faced a statutory
    maximum of ten years.     In this direct appeal, we therefore VACATE the
    judgment of the district court and REMAND for resentencing in light of
    Johnson.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-30130

Citation Numbers: 620 F. App'x 351

Judges: Davis, Clement, Costa

Filed Date: 10/26/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024