United States v. Ellis ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-50425      Document: 00516531558         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/02/2022
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 22-50425
    Summary Calendar                             FILED
    November 2, 2022
    Lyle W. Cayce
    United States of America,                                                 Clerk
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Jonathan Yul Ellis,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:06-CR-20-1
    Before Smith, Wiener, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    Defendant-Appellant Jonathan Yul Ellis appeals the district court’s
    denial of his motion for compassionate release. Ellis contends that his lengthy
    sentence constitutes an extraordinary and compelling reason for such release
    because, if he had been sentenced pursuant to the First Step Act, he would
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 22-50425      Document: 00516531558            Page: 2    Date Filed: 11/02/2022
    No. 22-50425
    not have received a mandatory consecutive 25-year sentence for his 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (c) conviction. Ellis also notes that the 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a) factors,
    including his participation in prison programs and his prison disciplinary
    record, weigh in favor of his release.
    We review the district court’s denial of compassionate release for
    abuse of discretion. See United States v. Chambliss, 
    948 F.3d 691
    , 693-94 (5th
    Cir. 2020). The district court diligently examined the § 3553(a) factors to
    reach its conclusion that Ellis is not entitled to relief. Ellis fails to show that
    the district court abused its discretion in that decision. See id. at 693. Because
    the district court’s § 3553(a) analysis supports dismissal, we need not
    consider Ellis’s arguments challenging the district court’s finding that he
    failed to show extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting relief. See
    United States v. Jackson, 
    27 F.4th 1088
    , 1093 & n.8 (5th Cir. 2022); Ward v.
    United States, 
    11 F.4th 354
    , 360-62 (5th Cir. 2021).
    The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-50425

Filed Date: 11/2/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/3/2022