United States v. Ryan Taylor , 676 F. App'x 256 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 16-40421      Document: 00513840889         Page: 1    Date Filed: 01/19/2017
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 16-40421                                  FILED
    Summary Calendar                         January 19, 2017
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    RYAN SCOTT DANIEL TAYLOR,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 2:15-CR-219-1
    Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Ryan Scott Daniel Taylor appeals an aspect of the sentence imposed after
    he pleaded guilty to credit card fraud and aggravated identity theft. He argues
    that the written judgment should be amended to accurately reflect the district
    court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing that it would recommend that Taylor
    participate in the 500-hour Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program
    (RDAP) offered by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP).                   The written judgment
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-40421   Document: 00513840889    Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/19/2017
    No. 16-40421
    recommends only a non-specific drug treatment program. Taylor contends that
    the BOP has several drug treatment programs but that only the RDAP can
    result in a sentence reduction. The Government agrees that the oral and
    written judgments are in conflict and that a remand for correction of the
    written judgment is appropriate.
    Accordingly, the written judgement is AMENDED to conform to the
    court’s oral pronouncement recommending that Taylor participate in the
    RDAP specifically. See United States v. Wheeler, 
    322 F.3d 823
    , 828 (5th Cir.
    2003); United States v. Castaneda, 494 F. App’x 484, 485 (5th Cir. 2012)
    (unpublished); 
    28 U.S.C. § 2106
    . In all other respects to the judgment is
    AFFIRMED as amended. See Wheeler, 
    322 F.3d at 828
    ; 
    28 U.S.C. § 2106
    .
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-40421

Citation Numbers: 676 F. App'x 256

Judges: Davis, Southwick, Higginson

Filed Date: 1/19/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024