United States v. James Nichols ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 15-41445      Document: 00513892949         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/01/2017
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 15-41445                               FILED
    March 1, 2017
    Lyle W. Cayce
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                        Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    JAMES DOUGLAS NICHOLS,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:13-CV-56
    USDC No. 4:09-CR-222-2
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    James Douglas Nichols, federal prisoner # 16570-078, filed a 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     motion to vacate his sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to
    distribute heroin. Nichols seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) and leave
    to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the magistrate judge’s order
    closing his case administratively. This court must examine the basis of its
    jurisdiction, sua sponte, if necessary. See Mosley v. Cozby, 
    813 F.2d 659
    , 660
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-41445    Document: 00513892949     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/01/2017
    No. 15-41445
    (5th Cir. 1987). A magistrate judge has authority to hear and determine
    pretrial matters. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (b)(1)(A). As a general rule, an order
    issued by a magistrate judge is not a final order appealable to this court. See
    Donaldson v. Ducote, 
    373 F.3d 622
    , 624 (5th Cir. 2004); see also Colburn v.
    Bunge Towing, Inc., 
    883 F.2d 372
    , 379 (5th Cir. 1989) (noting that appellate
    courts are without jurisdiction to hear appeals directly from federal magistrate
    judges). Additionally, the constitution does not permit a magistrate judge to
    enter a final judgment in a § 2255 proceeding. United States v. Johnston, 
    258 F.3d 361
    , 372 (5th Cir. 2001). We lack jurisdiction to address this appeal. See
    Donaldson, 
    373 F.3d at 624
    . Accordingly, we deny Nichols’s two motions as
    moot.
    APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED AS MOOT.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-41445

Judges: Higginbotham, Haynes, Graves

Filed Date: 3/1/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024