United States v. Jesus Martinez, Jr. , 638 F. App'x 401 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 15-50126      Document: 00513438273         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/24/2016
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-50126
    Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    March 24, 2016
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    JESUS MARTINEZ, JR., also known as Luis J. Martinez, also known as
    Chueyto, also known as Casper Martinez-Arredando, also known as Luis
    Martinez-Arredando,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:07-CR-553-4
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Martinez, Jr., has moved for
    leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
    
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
    (5th Cir. 2011).
    Martinez has filed a response and a motion to proceed pro se, which is denied.
    The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-50126    Document: 00513438273     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/24/2016
    No. 15-50126
    Martinez’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to
    consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States
    v. Isgar, 
    739 F.3d 829
    , 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
    We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
    reflected therein, as well as Martinez’s response. We concur with counsel’s
    assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
    Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed pro se is DENIED, the motion to
    withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
    herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-50126

Citation Numbers: 638 F. App'x 401

Judges: Elrod, Higginbotham, Per Curiam, Southwick

Filed Date: 3/24/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024