United States v. David Anderson , 667 F. App'x 151 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 15-50719      Document: 00513566264         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/27/2016
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-50719
    Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    June 27, 2016
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    DAVID LEE ANDERSON, also known as David Anderson, also known as
    David Zoba, also known as David L. Anderson,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 5:14-CR-123-1
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    David Lee Anderson appeals the 293-month within-guidelines sentence
    imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with the
    intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine.                          Anderson
    pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement wherein he waived the right to
    appeal his conviction and sentence on any ground, reserving only a claim of
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-50719    Document: 00513566264    Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/27/2016
    No. 15-50719
    ineffective assistance of counsel or prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional
    dimension.
    Although Anderson argues that his appeal waiver is unenforceable, our
    review of the record shows that the waiver was knowing and voluntary, as he
    knew that he had the right to appeal and that he was giving up that right by
    entering into the plea agreement. See United States v. Bond, 
    414 F.3d 542
    ,
    544 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v. Portillo, 
    18 F.3d 290
    , 292-93 (5th Cir.
    1994). Thus, the waiver, which has been invoked by the Government in this
    appeal, precludes consideration of Anderson’s challenge to the substantive
    reasonableness of his sentence. See United States v. Walters, 
    732 F.3d 489
    , 491
    (5th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-50719

Citation Numbers: 667 F. App'x 151

Judges: Higginbotham, Elrod, Southwick

Filed Date: 6/27/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024