United States v. Mendoza-Gallardo , 296 F. App'x 412 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    October 21, 2008
    No. 08-50010
    Conference Calendar           Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    JUAN JOSE MENDOZA-GALLARDO, also known as Juan Jose Mendoza-
    Castillo
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:07-CR-1342-ALL
    Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Juan Jose Mendoza-Gallardo (Mendoza) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry
    after deportation and was sentenced to 24 months of imprisonment and three
    years of supervised release.
    Mendoza argues on appeal that the district court erred in increasing his
    guidelines offense level by eight levels under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) based on
    its characterization of the more recent of his two prior state drug possession
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
    should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 08-50010
    convictions as an aggravated felony. Citing Lopez v. Gonzales, 
    549 U.S. 47
    (2006), he contends that the more recent state drug possession conviction could
    not constitute an aggravated felony because the State did not plead and prove
    that he was a recidivist when it obtained the conviction, as is required under 21
    U.S.C. §§ 844(a) and 851.
    Lopez has not altered our holding in United States v. Sanchez-Villalobos,
    
    412 F.3d 572
    (5th Cir.2005), that a second state conviction for simple possession
    qualifies as an aggravated felony sufficient to support the imposition of the
    eight-level enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). United States v. Cepeda-Rios,
    
    530 F.3d 333
    , 335 (5th Cir. 2008). The State’s failure to comply with the
    procedural requirements of §§ 844(a) and 851(a) in obtaining the second drug
    possession conviction does not prohibit the district court from enhancing a
    sentence on this basis. 
    Id. at 336
    n.11.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-50010

Citation Numbers: 296 F. App'x 412

Judges: King, Barksdale, Owen

Filed Date: 10/21/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024