United States v. Justin Blalock , 689 F. App'x 263 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 16-51014      Document: 00513977853         Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/03/2017
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    No. 16-51014
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    Summary Calendar                       May 3, 2017
    Lyle W. Cayce
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                   Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    JUSTIN AUBREY BLALOCK,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 6:15-CR-196-1
    Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Justin Aubrey Blalock was convicted by a jury of possession of a firearm
    during the commission of a drug trafficking crime and sentenced to the
    statutory minimum sentence of 60 months of imprisonment and a two-year
    term of supervised release.         On appeal, he argues that the evidence was
    insufficient for conviction because the Government did not demonstrate that
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-51014      Document: 00513977853        Page: 2    Date Filed: 05/03/2017
    No. 16-51014
    he possessed the firearms in furtherance of the drug trafficking crime. Our
    review is de novo. See United States v. Klein, 
    543 F.3d 206
    , 212 (5th Cir. 2008).
    In United States v. Ceballos-Torres, 
    218 F.3d 409
    , 414-15 (5th Cir.),
    amended on other grounds, 
    226 F.3d 651
     (5th Cir. 2000), we set out eight
    factors which would help to demonstrate that possession of the firearm
    furthered, advanced, or helped forward the drug trafficking offense. These
    factors indicate that Blalock’s case is more similar to the facts in Ceballos-
    Torres, where we affirmed the defendant’s conviction, than to the examples we
    gave of situations which would not support conviction. See Ceballos-Torres,
    218 F.3d at 415.
    Blalock testified that he sold approximately one pound of marijuana per
    week, that he sometimes repackaged and sold marijuana at his residence, that
    he had approximately two pounds of marijuana on the day his residence was
    searched, and that he feared others in the drug trade. Two loaded handguns
    were immediately accessible to Blalock when he was in bed.                   Blalock’s
    statement that he used the firearms for hunting and sport is difficult to credit,
    given that the handguns, at least, were easily accessible, loaded, and not stored
    in a locked cabinet or the like. See United States v. Riggins, 524 F. App’x 123,
    130 (5th Cir. 2013). 1 There was no evidence that the weapons were stolen, but
    Blalock’s possession of the firearms was arguably illegal based on his unlawful
    use of marijuana. See 
    18 U.S.C. § 922
    (g)(3). The majority of the marijuana
    and drug paraphernalia was in the vicinity, although not in the same room, as
    the firearms, and a small bag of marijuana and two rolls of cash were found in
    the same room as the firearms. See Ceballos-Torres, 218 F.3d at 415; United
    States v. Vidales, 575 F. App’x 470, 471 (5th Cir. 2014). Finally, nothing about
    1 Although an unpublished opinion issued after January 1, 1996, is not controlling
    precedent, it may be considered as persuasive authority. See Ballard v. Burton, 
    444 F.3d 391
    , 401 & n.7 (5th Cir. 2006) (citing 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4).
    2
    Case: 16-51014    Document: 00513977853     Page: 3   Date Filed: 05/03/2017
    No. 16-51014
    the “time and circumstances under which the gun [was] found,” Ceballos-
    Torres, 218 F.3d at 415, assists Blalock, as the firearms “were found as a result
    of a search warrant based on illegal drug activity,” Riggins, 524 F. App’x at
    131. On balance, these factors do not support Blalock’s position.
    Blalock’s comparison to United States v. Palmer, 
    456 F.3d 484
     (5th Cir.
    2006), is inapposite, as the defendant in that case kept his firearm unloaded
    and locked in a safe, while Blalock kept two loaded firearms easily accessible
    in his bedside table. And although Blalock argues that he kept the handguns
    for protection and for sport, “[a] jury is free to choose among reasonable
    constructions of the evidence.” United States v. Garcia, 
    567 F.3d 721
    , 731 (5th
    Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Viewing the record
    in the light most favorable to the Government, there was sufficient evidence
    for the jury to convict Blalock. See Klein, 
    543 F.3d at 212
    .
    AFFIRMED.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-51014 Summary Calendar

Citation Numbers: 689 F. App'x 263

Judges: Stewart, Jolly, Jones

Filed Date: 5/3/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024