Hammond v. Jones County ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                              No. 98-11290
    -1-
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 98-11290
    Conference Calendar
    LARRY HAMMOND,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    MIKE MIDDLETON ET AL.,
    Defendants,
    MIKE MIDDLETON; INFIRMARY DEPARTMENT;
    JONES COUNTY, THE POLITICAL ENTITY, ET AL.,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:97-CV-116-BA
    --------------------
    April 14, 2000
    Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Larry Hammond, TDCJ# 702676, appeals the bench trial verdict
    in favor of Jones County, dismissing his prisoner’s 42 U.S.C.
    § 1983 claim for deliberate indifference to his medical needs.
    Hammond argues that he suffered a serious medical need and that
    he was treated by non-medical personnel.
    Hammond has moved for appointment of counsel and to
    supplement the record.    Hammond has not demonstrated an
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 98-11290
    -2-
    exceptional circumstance warranting the appointment of counsel.
    See Akasike v. Fitzpatrick, 
    26 F.3d 510
    , 512 (5th Cir. 1994).
    Hammond may not introduce new evidence on appeal.   Schwarz v.
    Folloder, 
    767 F.2d 125
    , 128 n.2 (5th Cir. 1985).
    Hammond’s disagreement with the medical care is not
    actionable under § 1983.   See Varnado v. Lynaugh, 
    920 F.2d 320
    ,
    321 (5th Cir. 1991).
    AFFIRMED.   MOTIONS DENIED.