Portillo-Villanueva v. Garland ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-60317         Document: 00516677419             Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/15/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    ____________
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 22-60317
    Summary Calendar                                 FILED
    ____________                                March 15, 2023
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Darlin Diana Portillo-Villanueva,                                                  Clerk
    Petitioner,
    versus
    Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    ______________________________
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Agency No. A206 480 388
    ______________________________
    Before Davis, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam: *
    Darlin Diana Portillo-Villanueva, a native and citizen of Honduras,
    timely petitions us for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals denying her motion to reconsider the denial of her motion to reopen
    and rescind her in absentia order of removal.
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
    Case: 22-60317      Document: 00516677419          Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/15/2023
    No. 22-60317
    We review the denial of a motion to reconsider under an abuse-of-
    discretion standard. Gonzales-Veliz v. Barr, 
    938 F.3d 219
    , 226 (5th Cir. 2019).
    Under this standard, Portillo-Villanueva must identify either a “change in
    the law, a misapplication of the law, or an aspect of the case that the BIA
    overlooked.” Zhao v. Gonzales, 
    404 F.3d 295
    , 304 (5th Cir. 2005).
    We do not find that the Board should have granted Portillo-
    Villanueva’s motion. She waived her right to notice by failing to provide the
    immigration court with her correct address. Spagnol-Bastos v. Garland, 
    19 F.4th 802
     (5th Cir. 2021).
    We lack jurisdiction to consider Portillo-Villanueva’s argument that
    the Board should have exercised its sua sponte authority to reconsider her
    case. Qorane v. Barr, 
    919 F.3d 904
    , 912-13 (5th Cir. 2019).
    DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-60317

Filed Date: 3/15/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/15/2023