United States v. Edgardo Grande ( 2020 )

Case: 19-50272 Document: 00515381385 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/14/2020
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 19-50272 April 14, 2020
Summary Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
EDGARDO GRANDE,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:18-CR-3088-1
Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Edgardo Grande pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement,
to importing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a), and was
sentenced to 108 months of imprisonment. He now contends that the sentence
imposed is unreasonable. The Government asserts that the appeal is barred by
the waiver-of-appeal provision in Grande’s plea agreement. We agree with the
Government.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 19-50272 Document: 00515381385 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/14/2020
No. 19-50272
Grande’s newly raised argument that his plea deal was unconscionable
is without merit. This court has long held that a defendant may waive his
statutory right to appeal as part of a valid plea agreement so long as the waiver
is knowing and voluntary. See, e.g., United States v. Higgins, 739 F.3d 733, 736
(5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Jacobs, 635 F.3d 778, 781 (5th Cir. 2011).
Grande does not argue that his waiver was unknowing or involuntary.
The appeal waiver in the plea agreement therefore bars Grande’s
challenge to the sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
2