United States v. Raymundo Ramos-Garcia ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 19-40918      Document: 00515383224         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/15/2020
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    No. 19-40918
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    Conference Calendar                    April 15, 2020
    Lyle W. Cayce
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                   Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    RAYMUNDO RAMOS-GARCIA, also known as Raymondo Ramos Garcia,
    also known as Raymundo Ramos Garcia, also known as Raymundo
    RamosGarcia, also known as Dimundo Romos,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 2:19-CR-799-1
    Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raymundo Ramos-
    Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
    with Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
    (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos-Garcia has not filed a response. He did,
    however, execute a waiver of any challenge to his conviction; accordingly, we
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-40918     Document: 00515383224     Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/15/2020
    No. 19-40918
    conclude that his conviction is not before us and will not address it further. See
    United States v. Polanco-Ozorto, 
    772 F.3d 1053
    , 1055 (5th Cir. 2014)
    (“Accordingly, we will not address the issues raised in Polanco-Ozorto’s
    response [to his attorney’s Anders brief] related to his plea and conviction.”);
    United States v. Garcia, 
    483 F.3d 289
    , 290-91 (5th Cir. 2007). With respect to
    his sentence, he has been released from incarceration and has no term of
    supervised release such that any challenge to his sentence is moot, see Spencer
    v. Kemna, 
    523 U.S. 1
    , 7 (1998). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
    withdraw is GRANTED and counsel is excused from further responsibilities
    herein. The APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-40918

Filed Date: 4/15/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/16/2020