Williams v. Young , 311 F. App'x 698 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    February 18, 2009
    No. 08-30078
    Conference Calendar            Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    TERRELL DEVON WILLIAMS
    Petitioner-Appellant
    v.
    JOE YOUNG
    Respondent-Appellee
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 2:07-CV-485
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Terrell Devon Williams, federal prisoner # 28396-018, has moved to
    proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his appeal of the district court’s denial of
    relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. A movant for leave to proceed IFP on
    appeal must show that he is a pauper and that the appeal is taken in good faith.
    Carson v. Polley, 
    689 F.2d 562
    , 586 (5th Cir. 1982).
    *
    Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
    should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 08-30078
    Williams was sentenced in the Middle District of Florida to a 42-month
    term of imprisonment for making a false statement to a federally insured
    financial institution. He was also sentenced by the Florida district court to two
    15-month sentences, which were imposed due to the revocation of his terms of
    supervised release. All sentences run consecutively.
    Williams acknowledges that he was given credit for 208 days, which
    represents the time he was detained prior to the commencement of his sentence.
    He argues, however, that he was entitled to 208 days of credit toward each of his
    three sentences for the time he was detained prior to sentencing.
    The Attorney General, through the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), determines
    what credit, if any, will be awarded to prisoners for time spent in custody prior
    to the start of their sentences. United States v. Wilson, 
    503 U.S. 329
    , 331-32,
    334 (1992); see also Leal v. Tombone, 
    341 F.3d 427
    , 428 (5th Cir. 2003). The BOP
    was required to treat Williams’s multiple terms of imprisonment as a single,
    aggregate term of imprisonment.       See 18 U.S.C. § 3584(c).      As Williams
    acknowledges, he received 208 days of credit toward his aggregate term of 72
    months of imprisonment.      Williams is not entitled to credit toward each
    individual sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b).
    Williams has not shown that his appeal presents a nonfrivolous issue.
    Accordingly, his IFP motion is denied, and his appeal is dismissed as frivolous.
    See 
    Carson, 689 F.2d at 586
    ; 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.     Williams’s motion for the
    appointment of counsel is denied. See Schwander v. Blackburn, 
    750 F.2d 494
    ,
    502 (5th Cir. 1985).
    IFP MOTION DENIED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
    DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-30078

Citation Numbers: 311 F. App'x 698

Judges: Higginbotham, Dennis, Prado

Filed Date: 2/18/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024