Gutierrez-Llamas v. Mukasey , 292 F. App'x 346 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    September 11, 2008
    No. 07-60298
    Summary Calendar                Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    LAURO GUTIERREZ-LLAMAS, also known as Larry Gutierrez
    Petitioner
    v.
    MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
    Respondent
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    BIA No. A08 149 517
    Before DAVIS, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Lauro Gutierrez-Llamas (Gutierrez), a native and citizen of Mexico,
    petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision
    affirming a final order of removal. Gutierrez argues that he is eligible for relief
    under former 
    8 U.S.C. § 1182
    (a) (repealed), because that statute does not require
    the existence of a corresponding or comparable ground of removability in order
    to obtain discretionary relief, and the denial of relief under that section violates
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
    should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 07-60298
    equal protection.    He also requests remand to pursue an application for
    adjustment of status.
    To the extent that Gutierrez requests that he be allowed to apply for an
    adjustment of status through his United States citizen daughter, he has not
    adequately briefed this issue, see Yohey v. Collins, 
    985 F.2d 222
    , 224-25 (5th Cir.
    1993), and we lack jurisdiction to address this claim because he did not request
    this relief before the BIA. See 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    (d)(1) (requiring exhaustion of
    administrative remedies); Falek v. Gonzales, 
    475 F.3d 285
    , 289 (5th Cir. 2007).
    Gutierrez’s assertions that he is entitled to relief under § 1182(c) are foreclosed
    by our precedent. See Vo v. Gonzales, 
    482 F.3d 363
     (5th Cir. 2007); Avilez-
    Granados v. Gonzales, 
    481 F.3d 869
     (5th Cir. 2007); Cantu v. Mukasey, 267
    F. App’x 321 (5th Cir. 2008) (unpublished).
    The petition for review is DENIED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-60298

Citation Numbers: 292 F. App'x 346

Judges: Davis, Garza, Per Curiam, Prado

Filed Date: 9/11/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024