United States v. Thackerson ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-10675         Document: 00516690552             Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/27/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    ____________
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 22-10675
    Summary Calendar                                 FILED
    ____________                                March 27, 2023
    Lyle W. Cayce
    United States of America,                                                          Clerk
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Ashley Latreece Thackerson,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 6:21-CR-58-13
    ______________________________
    Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam: *
    Ashley Latreece Thackerson appeals the sentence imposed following
    her guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute and possess 50 grams
    or more of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. Relying on United
    States v. Lopez, 
    998 F.3d 431
     (9th Cir. 2021), Thackerson argues that she is
    eligible for safety valve relief under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (f) and that her statutory
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
    Case: 22-10675       Document: 00516690552          Page: 2     Date Filed: 03/27/2023
    No. 22-10675
    mandatory minimum prison term of 120 months should be vacated. The
    Government has filed an opposed motion for summary affirmance or, in the
    alternative, for an extension of time to file an appellate brief.
    Thackerson’s argument is now foreclosed by our recent decision in
    United States v. Palomares, 
    52 F.4th 640
     (5th Cir. 2022), petition for cert. filed
    (U.S. Dec. 21, 2022) (No. 22-6391). Because Thackerson ran afoul of
    § 3553(f)(1)(B)’s requirement that she not have a prior three-point criminal
    offense, she was ineligible for relief under § 3553(f). See Palomares, 52 F.4th
    at 647.
    In light of the foregoing, the judgment of the district court is
    AFFIRMED. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance and
    alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief are DENIED. See
    United States v. Bailey, 
    924 F.3d 1289
    , 1290 (5th Cir. 2019).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-10675

Filed Date: 3/27/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/28/2023