Edwards v. Cain ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Case: 20-60445     Document: 00515822383         Page: 1     Date Filed: 04/14/2021
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    April 14, 2021
    No. 20-60445
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    Jonathan Edwards,
    Petitioner—Appellant,
    versus
    Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections,
    Respondent—Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Mississippi
    USDC No. 2:20-CV-47
    Before Clement, Elrod and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    Jonathan Edwards, Mississippi prisoner # 44510, moves for a
    certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s decision to
    grant him voluntary dismissal of his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     case, in which he
    sought to challenge his 2017 conviction and sentence for burglary of a
    dwelling in case number K15-219H. He also moves for leave to proceed in
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 20-60445     Document: 00515822383          Page: 2    Date Filed: 04/14/2021
    No. 20-60445
    forma pauperis (IFP). In seeking a COA, Edwards argues only the merits of
    his § 2254 claims, without raising any error regarding the voluntary dismissal
    of the case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a).
    “[W]e must consider the basis of our own jurisdiction, sua sponte if
    necessary.” Perez v. Stephens, 
    784 F.3d 276
    , 280 (5th Cir. 2015). The district
    court’s decision to grant Edwards voluntary dismissal without prejudice and
    without any conditions is not a final appealable decision. See Williams v.
    Seidenbach, 
    958 F.3d 341
    , 343, 349 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc); Mortg. Guar.
    Ins. Corp. v. Richard Carlyon Co., 
    904 F.2d 298
    , 300 (5th Cir. 1990).
    Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.
    The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and Edwards’s
    motions for a COA and leave to proceed IFP are DENIED as moot.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-60445

Filed Date: 4/14/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/15/2021