United States v. Hawkins ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-50360
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    STEVIE LAMAR HAWKINS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. W-00-CR-112-ALL
    --------------------
    December 27, 2002
    Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Stevie Lamar Hawkins appeals his bench-trial conviction for
    possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine.    He
    challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized
    pursuant to a search warrant.
    In reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress evidence
    obtained pursuant to a search warrant, we determine: (1) whether
    the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies; and
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-50360
    -2-
    (2) if not, whether probable cause supported the warrant.     United
    States v. Cherna, 
    184 F.3d 403
    , 407 (5th Cir. 1999).
    Hawkins contends that the good-faith exception does not
    apply because the affidavit on which the search warrant was based
    was merely a “bare bones” affidavit.   Specifically, he argues
    that the affidavit did not establish the reliability of the
    informant, that it was vague and conclusional, and that it
    contained insufficient corroboration of the informant’s
    allegations.
    The affidavit was based on the personal observations of a
    concerned citizen and the investigating officer.   Moreover, the
    information provided by the citizen was sufficiently detailed and
    was corroborated by the investigating officer’s personal
    observations and by information learned from another law
    enforcement officer.   United States v. Satterwhite, 
    980 F.2d 317
    ,
    320 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Fields, 
    72 F.3d 1200
    , 1214
    (5th Cir. 1996).   Given the foregoing, the judgment of the
    district court is AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-50360

Filed Date: 12/30/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014