Angelitos Health Care v. Becerra ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-40298         Document: 00516710951             Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/13/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    ____________                                     FILED
    April 13, 2023
    No. 22-40298                               Lyle W. Cayce
    ____________                                     Clerk
    Angelitos Health Care, Incorporated,
    Plaintiff—Appellant,
    versus
    Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human
    Services,
    Defendant—Appellee.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 7:20-CV-35
    ______________________________
    Before King, Jones, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam: *
    Angelitos Health Care (“Angelitos”) provides home health care
    services to Medicare beneficiaries. In 2011, a government contractor audited
    a random sample of Angelitos’ 2008–09 Medicare claims, found that
    numerous claims were improperly documented, and concluded through
    statistical extrapolation that Angelitos had been overpaid by over $1 million.
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
    Case: 22-40298     Document: 00516710951          Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/13/2023
    No. 22-40298
    Angelitos challenged the audit through Medicare’s administrative appeals
    process, which involves further review by additional contractors, an
    Administrative Law Judge, and the Medicare Appeals Council. See Maxmed
    Healthcare, Inc. v. Price, 
    860 F.3d 335
    , 338 (5th Cir. 2017). This process
    largely confirmed the initial audit. Angelitos then sought judicial review.
    With the exception of one claim not relevant here, a magistrate judge
    recommended upholding the Council’s decision. The district judge adopted
    the recommendation in full, and Angelitos appealed.
    Having carefully reviewed the record, the detailed opinion by the
    magistrate judge, and the parties’ briefs, and having also heard oral
    argument, we find no reversible error.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-40298

Filed Date: 4/13/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/13/2023