United States v. Sunny Robinson ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 17-20653      Document: 00514618754         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/28/2018
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 17-20653                                 FILED
    Summary Calendar                         August 28, 2018
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    SUNNY ROBINSON,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:09-CR-422-1
    Before BENAVIDES, HIGGINSON, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Sunny Robinson, federal prisoner # 43681-279, was convicted by a jury
    of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, aiding and abetting health care
    fraud, conspiracy to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute, and paying kickbacks
    in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute.            Robinson was sentenced to 97
    months of imprisonment and to concurrent three-year terms of supervised
    release. He appeals the denial of his pro se motion for reduction of sentence
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-20653    Document: 00514618754     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/28/2018
    No. 17-20653
    under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), based on Amendment 792 to the Sentencing
    Guidelines, which amended, inter alia, the definition of “intended loss” under
    U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1.
    The district court correctly noted that Amendment 792 was not among
    the amendments listed in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(d), and therefore concluded that a
    sentence reduction was not authorized under § 3582(c)(2). See Dillon v. United
    States, 
    560 U.S. 817
    , 825-26 (2010). However, according to the Bureau of
    Prisons website, Robinson was released from imprisonment on April 27, 2018.
    “Where a defendant has begun serving a term of supervised release, the appeal
    of the denial of his § 3582(c)(2) motion is moot.” United States v. Booker, 
    645 F.3d 328
    , 328 (5th Cir. 2011).
    Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-20653

Filed Date: 8/28/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021