United States v. Francis Salcie-De Los Santos , 637 F. App'x 846 ( 2016 )

Case: 15-40630 Document: 00513405312 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-40630
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
March 3, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FRANCIS DAVID SALCIE-DE LOS SANTOS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:14-CR-884-1
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Francis David Salcie-De Los Santos appeals the 18-month sentence he
received following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry. His sole
argument, raised for the first time on appeal, is that the district court erred in
assessing an eight-level increase under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) based on his
prior convictions for aggravated felonies. Because Salcie did not raise this
argument below, review is for plain error only. See United States v. Peltier,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 15-40630 Document: 00513405312 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/03/2016
No. 15-40630
505 F.3d 389, 391 (5th Cir. 2007). To demonstrate plain error, Salcie must
show a clear or obvious error that affects his substantial rights; even if he
makes this showing, this court has the discretion to correct the error but only
if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial
proceedings. Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). Salcie has
failed to satisfy this burden. See id; United States v. Trejo, 610 F.3d 308, 319
(5th Cir. 2010); see also 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), 841(b)(1)(C); U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2,
comment. (n.3(A)); United States v. Arces-Venes v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 167, 171
(5th Cir. 2007).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2