United States v. Ceron Munoz ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Case: 21-40423     Document: 00516256339         Page: 1     Date Filed: 03/28/2022
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    March 28, 2022
    No. 21-40423
    Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Jesus Arcadio Ceron Munoz, also known as Compa, also known as
    Pastuso,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:12-CR-295-6
    Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    Jesus Arcadio Ceron Munoz, federal prisoner # 26387-078, moves for
    leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. The district court denied
    his motion for compassionate release under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(1)(A) and
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 21-40423       Document: 00516256339          Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/28/2022
    No. 21-40423
    also denied his motion to reconsider that ruling. Ceron Munoz contends that
    the district court erred in denying compassionate release and reconsideration
    because (1) the court relied on the policy statement in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 and
    also relied on 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a) in assessing his entitlement to
    compassionate release and (2) the conditions at his facility with respect to
    COVID-19 coupled with his debilitating chronic illnesses warrants
    compassionate release.
    To proceed IFP on appeal, Ceron Munoz must present, inter alia, a
    nonfrivolous argument that the district court abused its discretion by denying
    his motion to reconsider its denial of compassionate release. See Jackson v.
    Dall. Police Dep’t, 
    811 F.2d 260
    , 261 (5th Cir. 1986). An issue is nonfrivolous
    if it is arguable on its merits. Howard v. King, 
    707 F.2d 215
    , 220 (5th Cir.
    1983).
    Ceron Munoz fails to identify a nonfrivolous basis for the challenging
    the denial of compassionate release. See Ward v. United States, 
    11 F.4th 354
    ,
    359-62 (5th Cir. 2021); see also Howard, 
    707 F.2d at 220
    . Similarly, Ceron
    Munoz fails to show that the district court arguably abused its discretion by
    denying his motion to reconsider that ruling. See United States v. O’Keefe,
    
    128 F.3d 885
    , 892 (5th Cir. 1997); Behringer v. Johnson, 
    75 F.3d 189
    , 190 (5th
    Cir. 1996); see also Howard, 
    707 F.2d at 220
    .
    We DISMISS Ceron Munoz’s appeal as frivolous and DENY the
    motion to proceed IFP on appeal. See Baugh v. Taylor, 
    117 F.3d 197
    , 202
    & n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
    2