United States v. Cupples ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-50726         Document: 00516828049             Page: 1      Date Filed: 07/20/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    ____________
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 22-50726
    Summary Calendar                                   FILED
    ____________                                     July 20, 2023
    Lyle W. Cayce
    United States of America,                                                           Clerk
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    James Robert Cupples,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 7:21-CR-367-1
    ______________________________
    Before Jolly, Smith, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam: *
    James Robert Cupples pleaded guilty to one count of receipt of child
    pornography, in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 2252
    (a)(2) and (b)(1). The district
    court sentenced him to 198 months of imprisonment, to be followed by
    10 years of supervised release. Cupples challenges the application of a higher
    offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.1 by operation of the cross-reference in
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
    Case: 22-50726      Document: 00516828049           Page: 2    Date Filed: 07/20/2023
    No. 22-50726
    U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(c)(1), which “is to be construed broadly.” § 2G2.2,
    comment. (n.7(A)).      We review the district court’s interpretation and
    application of the Guidelines de novo and its factual findings for clear error.
    See United States v. Ferris, 
    52 F.4th 235
    , 239 (5th Cir. 2022), cert. denied, 
    143 S. Ct. 846 (2023)
    .
    The record supports the district court’s determination that the
    Government proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Cupples
    caused a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of
    producing a visual depiction of such conduct. See § 2G2.2, comment.
    (n.7(A)); United States v. Landreneau, 
    967 F.3d 443
    , 451 (5th Cir. 2020);
    United States v. Rodriguez, 
    630 F.3d 377
    , 380 (5th Cir. 2011). And as Cupples
    concedes, the court properly enhanced his sentence under § 2G2.1(b)(2)(A)
    because the offense involved the commission of sexual contact. See United
    States v. Butler, 
    65 F.4th 199
    , 201-03 (5th Cir. 2023); United States v. Salinas,
    
    918 F.3d 463
    , 465 (5th Cir. 2019).
    The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-50726

Filed Date: 7/20/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/21/2023