United States v. Carrasco ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-50990         Document: 00516871391             Page: 1      Date Filed: 08/24/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    ____________
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 22-50990
    Summary Calendar                                  FILED
    ____________                                August 24, 2023
    Lyle W. Cayce
    United States of America,                                                           Clerk
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Rigoberto Carrasco,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 7:22-CR-118-1
    ______________________________
    Before Haynes, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam: *
    The attorney appointed to represent Rigoberto Carrasco has moved
    for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
     (5th
    Cir. 2011). Carrasco has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
    brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
    Case: 22-50990     Document: 00516871391          Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/24/2023
    No. 22-50990
    with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
    appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
    GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
    the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
    The record reflects a clerical error in the written judgment. The
    record indicates that Carrasco pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with
    intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a
    detectable amount of methamphetamine, but the judgment incorrectly
    identifies the nature of the offense as involving 500 grams or more of actual
    methamphetamine. Accordingly, because the written judgment erroneously
    identifies offense of conviction, we REMAND for the limited purpose of
    correction of that clerical error in the written judgment in accordance with
    Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-50990

Filed Date: 8/24/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/25/2023