Hopkins v. Hosemann ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •         United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    ___________
    United States Court of Appeals
    No. 19-60662                                   Fifth Circuit
    CONSOLIDATED WITH                                FILED
    No. 19-60678                         September 28, 2023
    ___________                              Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    Dennis Hopkins, individually and on behalf of a class of all others
    similarly situated; Herman Parker, Jr., individually and on behalf of a
    class of all others similarly situated; Walter Wayne Kuhn, Jr.,
    individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated; Bryon
    Demond Coleman, individually and on behalf of a class of all others
    similarly situated; Jon O’Neal, individually and on behalf of a class of all
    others similarly situated; Earnest Willhite, individually and on behalf
    of a class of all others similarly situated,
    Plaintiffs—Appellees,
    versus
    Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann, in his official capacity,
    Defendant—Appellant,
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Mississippi
    USDC No. 3:18-CV-188
    ______________________________
    No. 19-60662
    c/w No. 19-60678
    ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
    (Opinion August 4, 2023, 5 Cir., 2023, 
    76 F.4th 378
    )
    Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart,
    Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett,
    Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, and Douglas,
    Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:
    A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for
    rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service
    and not disqualified having voted in favor,
    IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en
    banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will
    specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to
    5th Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated August 4, 2023, is
    VACATED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-60662

Filed Date: 9/28/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/28/2023