United States v. Meals ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 23-10554         Document: 00516914982             Page: 1      Date Filed: 09/29/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    ____________
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 23-10554
    Summary Calendar                                  FILED
    ____________                             September 29, 2023
    Lyle W. Cayce
    United States of America,                                                           Clerk
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    David Lewis Meals, Jr.,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:13-CR-23-1
    ______________________________
    Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam: *
    David Lewis Meals, Jr., federal prisoner # 40910-280, appeals the
    denial of his motion to further reduce his 225-month sentence for possession
    with intent to distribute a controlled substance, filed pursuant to 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(2). The district court previously granted Meals a reduction based
    upon Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Meals contends that
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
    Case: 23-10554      Document: 00516914982          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/29/2023
    No. 23-10554
    the district court’s decision that the 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a) sentencing factors
    did not warrant a further sentence reduction for his methamphetamine
    offense was an abuse of discretion.
    Contrary to Meals’s argument, the district court considered his
    arguments for a lower sentence but concluded that pertinent sentencing
    factors of § 3553(a) did not weigh in favor of a further reduction. See United
    States v. Evans, 
    587 F.3d 667
    , 673 (5th Cir. 2009). Because the district court
    was not obligated to reduce Meals’s sentence at all, the district court did not
    have to reduce it further than it did within the recalculated guidelines range.
    See 
    id.
     Meals’s argument amounts to a disagreement with the court’s
    balancing of the § 3553(a) sentencing factors, which is not sufficient to
    demonstrate an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 
    526 F.3d 804
    , 807 (5th Cir. 2008).
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-10554

Filed Date: 9/29/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2023