United States v. Pertile ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-50839        Document: 00516899064             Page: 1      Date Filed: 09/18/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    ____________                                United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 22-50839                              September 18, 2023
    Summary Calendar
    Lyle W. Cayce
    ____________
    Clerk
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Dustin Michael Pertile,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 7:22-CR-91-1
    ______________________________
    Before Stewart, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam: *
    Dustin Michael Pertile pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a felon.
    The district court sentenced him to 96 months in prison. He now appeals his
    sentence.
    Pertile argues that the district court erred by applying an enhancement
    under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) for possession of a firearm in connection
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
    Case: 22-50839       Document: 00516899064         Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/18/2023
    No. 22-50839
    with another felony offense.       Because Pertile did not object to this
    enhancement in the district court, our review is for plain error. See United
    States v. Buendia, 
    73 F.4th 336
    , 339 (5th Cir. 2023). To demonstrate plain
    error, Pertile must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that
    affects his substantial rights. See Puckett v. United States, 
    556 U.S. 129
    , 135
    (2009). If he makes such a showing, this court has the discretion to correct
    the error only if it “seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public
    reputation of judicial proceedings.” 
    Id.
     (quotation marks, brackets, and
    citation omitted).
    The record as a whole supports a conclusion that Pertile possessed a
    firearm in close proximity to drug paraphernalia and that he was engaged in
    the felony offense of drug distribution. Thus, the court did not commit clear
    or obvious error by applying the enhancement. See § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B),
    comment (n.14(B)); see also United States v. Bass, 
    996 F.3d 729
    , 742 (5th Cir.
    2021).
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-50839

Filed Date: 9/18/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/19/2023