Thomas v. Moore ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 23-30279        Document: 00516903434             Page: 1      Date Filed: 09/21/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                                   United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    ____________                                FILED
    September 21, 2023
    No. 23-30279
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Summary Calendar                             Clerk
    ____________
    Ronny Lee Thomas,
    Plaintiff—Appellant,
    versus
    Tony R. Moore, Sheriff Officer Lieutenant; Steve Prator, Sheriff
    Department Chief,
    Defendants—Appellees.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 5:22-CV-6232
    ______________________________
    Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    Ronny Lee Thomas appeals the district court’s dismissal with
    prejudice of his pro se 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action as frivolous and malicious
    under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (e)(2)(B)(i). We review the district court’s dismissal
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
    Case: 23-30279     Document: 00516903434           Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/21/2023
    No. 23-30279
    under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for an abuse of discretion. See Shakouri v. Davis,
    
    923 F.3d 407
    , 410 (5th Cir. 2019).
    An action may be dismissed as frivolous or malicious if it duplicates
    claims raised by the same plaintiff in previous or pending litigation. See
    Pittman v. Moore, 
    980 F.2d 994
    , 994-95 (5th Cir. 1993); Wilson v. Lynaugh,
    
    878 F.2d 846
    , 850 (5th Cir. 1989); Bailey v. Johnson, 
    846 F.2d 1019
    , 1021 (5th
    Cir. 1988).    The district court noted that Thomas’s complaint was
    duplicative of a federal action he had previously filed, which had been
    dismissed with prejudice. Thomas has not shown that the district court
    abused its discretion in dismissing his complaint on that basis. See Shakouri,
    
    923 F.3d at 410
    ; Bailey, 
    846 F.2d at 1021
    .
    Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-30279

Filed Date: 9/21/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/21/2023