United States v. Pollard ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 23-30233        Document: 00516932634             Page: 1      Date Filed: 10/16/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    ____________
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 23-30233                                    FILED
    Summary Calendar                           October 16, 2023
    ____________                                 Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Donald Leonard Pollard, Jr.,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 3:21-CR-251-1
    ______________________________
    Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam: *
    Donald Leonard Pollard, Jr., pleaded guilty to count 3 of a five-count
    indictment charging him with distribution of methamphetamine, and he was
    sentenced to a 300-month term of imprisonment and to a five-year period of
    supervised release.
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
    Case: 23-30233     Document: 00516932634           Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/16/2023
    No. 23-30233
    At sentencing, the district court overruled Pollard’s objection to
    consideration of the conduct underlying the dismissed counts 1, 2, 4, and 5
    as relevant conduct in determining the drug quantity. Pollard was ultimately
    sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, and he has appealed
    his sentence.
    Pollard contends that the district court erred in its relevant-conduct
    finding. We have not reached this question because any error was harmless.
    Pollard’s offense level was determined on the basis of his career-offender
    designation, which did not depend upon the court’s relevant conduct finding.
    See United States v. Bams, 
    858 F.3d 937
    , 948-49 (5th Cir. 2017). The
    judgment is AFFIRMED.
    The case is REMANDED to the district court for the limited
    purposed of correcting the judgment to list the correct statute of conviction.
    See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36; see also 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (b)(1)(A)(viii).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-30233

Filed Date: 10/16/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/17/2023