United States v. Suber ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 23-30088        Document: 00517000524             Page: 1      Date Filed: 12/13/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit
    ____________                              United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 23-30088                           December 13, 2023
    Summary Calendar
    ____________                                 Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Anthony Suber,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 1:22-CR-20-1
    ______________________________
    Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit
    Judges.
    Per Curiam: *
    Anthony Suber appeals the 51-month sentence imposed following his
    guilty-plea conviction of causing bodily injury by assaulting, resisting, or
    impeding certain officers or employees. Specifically, Suber challenges the
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 23-30088      Document: 00517000524           Page: 2    Date Filed: 12/13/2023
    No. 23-30088
    six-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(c)(2) for assaulting a prison
    official while in custody.
    We review the district court’s interpretation and application of the
    guidelines de novo and its factual findings for clear error. See United States v.
    Perryman, 
    965 F.3d 424
    , 426 (5th Cir. 2020). “A factual finding is not clearly
    erroneous as long as it is plausible in light of the record read as a whole.”
    United States v. Sanders, 
    942 F.2d 894
    , 897 (5th Cir. 1991).
    Suber contends that, because he was blinded and disoriented by
    pepper spray, he neither knew nor had reasonable cause to believe that any
    victim of his assault was a prison official as Section 3A1.2(c)(2) requires. The
    record shows that officers orally ordered Suber to stop fighting with his
    cellmate, deployed pepper spray, and then opened the cell door, after which
    Suber crawled or rolled out of the cell and bit two officers while they tried to
    restrain him.    The district court’s finding that the enhancement was
    warranted is plausible in light of the record as a whole.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-30088

Filed Date: 12/13/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/14/2023