United States v. Melvin Lutcher , 537 F. App'x 455 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 12-30667       Document: 00512322240         Page: 1     Date Filed: 07/26/2013
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    July 26, 2013
    No. 12-30667
    Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    MELVIN LUTCHER, also known as Mel, also known as Big Mel,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 2:03-CR-338-2
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Melvin Lutcher, federal prisoner # 21092-034, was convicted of conspiracy
    to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine and powder cocaine and of use
    of a communication facility to facilitate the commission of his drug offense. He
    was sentenced in 2005 to 293 months of imprisonment on the drug charge and
    48 months on the communication facility charge, with the sentences to be served
    concurrently. In 2011, he sought relief pursuant to 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(2), based
    on the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (FSA) and the amendments to the Sentencing
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-30667    Document: 00512322240      Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/26/2013
    No. 12-30667
    Guidelines that were implemented in the wake of the FSA. The district court
    granted Lutcher’s motion and reduced the sentence to 240 months of
    imprisonment.
    On appeal, Lutcher first argues that he was deprived of due process
    because he was not provided with a copy of a supplement to his presentence
    report. However, there was no such supplement, and Lutcher’s contention lacks
    a basis in fact.
    Next, Lutcher contends that the district court erred by failing to apply the
    FSA and the guideline amendments arising from the FSA. He further argues
    that his new sentence should have been based on the subsection of the current
    
    21 U.S.C. § 841
     applicable to 50 grams of crack cocaine.
    The FSA is inapplicable to Lutcher’s case, as he was sentenced before the
    effective date of the FSA. See United States v. Doggins, 
    633 F.3d 379
    , 384 (5th
    Cir. 2011). The pre-FSA version of § 841 remains applicable to Lutcher’s
    sentence. Because Lutcher’s sentence was enhanced pursuant to 
    21 U.S.C. § 851
    , he remains subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years of
    imprisonment. See § 841(b)(1)(A)(iii) (2005). The 20-year mandatory minimum
    is higher than the guideline sentencing range the district court calculated based
    on the amended guidelines, so the 20-year mandatory minimum became the
    guideline sentencing range. U.S.S.G. § 5G1.1(b). The district court could not
    have reduced Lutcher’s sentence below 240 months. See United States v.
    Doublin, 
    572 F.3d 235
    , 237 (5th Cir. 2009).
    Lutcher has failed to demonstrate that the district court’s reduction of his
    sentence to 240 months was an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Evans,
    
    587 F.3d 667
    , 672 (5th Cir. 2009).
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-30667

Citation Numbers: 537 F. App'x 455

Judges: Higginbotham, Dennis, Graves

Filed Date: 7/26/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024