United States v. McDowell ( 1995 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    __________________
    No. 95-50044
    Conference Calendar
    __________________
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    BERNARD LEE MCDOWELL,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. A-92-CR-111-2
    - - - - - - - - - -
    June 29, 1995
    Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM*
    Bernard Lee McDowell's motion to proceed in forma pauperis
    on appeal is DENIED.    McDowell has not demonstrated that the
    district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for
    the production of grand jury materials because he has not shown a
    "particularized need" for the materials that outweighs the policy
    of secrecy.   See United States v. Miramontez, 
    995 F.2d 56
    , 59
    (5th Cir. 1993).
    On appeal, McDowell can present no legal points arguable on
    *
    Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions
    that have no precedential value and merely decide particular
    cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes
    needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal
    profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published.
    No. 95-50044
    -2-
    their merits, and the appeal from the denial of his motion is
    frivolous.   See Howard v. King, 
    707 F.2d 215
    , 220 (5th Cir.
    1983).   Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED.     See
    5th Cir. Rule 42.2.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-50044

Filed Date: 7/6/1995

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021